During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Мерц резко сменил риторику во время встречи в Китае09:25
。WPS下载最新地址对此有专业解读
Navigate to APIs & Services > Credentials. Check each API key's configuration. You're looking for two types of keys:
英伟达投资OpenAI，OpenAI的算力需求带动微软采购英伟达芯片，而英伟达的芯片则由台积电代工生产；台积电获得资本开支后持续升级制程，反过来支撑英伟达的技术迭代，同时上游企业还能从下游的股权中获得额外收益。
Both presenters were sacked in July.